I love this. Logic abound.
I would be genuinely interested in a well thought out
response. It’s not often I can’t immediately imagine what it would be and here,
the logic is simple enough that I wonder how much further you could nitpick,
outside of arguing the nature of the ‘God’ in question.
Following from the above, I think it stands very well to
reason that there had to be a first cause with actual intent, implying the
presence of something greater than us outside of natural physical development.
I believe it to be God.
What would one who is certain of the absence of a god (as
implied by atheism as opposed to agnosticism) believe it to be?
